Filed: Aug. 05, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 5, 2010 No. 09-12997 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00117-CR-3-MCR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CURTIS D. DALE, a.k.a. Curtis Donnell Dale, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 5, 2010) Before CARNES, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges. P
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 5, 2010 No. 09-12997 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00117-CR-3-MCR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CURTIS D. DALE, a.k.a. Curtis Donnell Dale, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (August 5, 2010) Before CARNES, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges. PE..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 5, 2010
No. 09-12997 JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00117-CR-3-MCR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CURTIS D. DALE,
a.k.a. Curtis Donnell Dale,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(August 5, 2010)
Before CARNES, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Augustus Harper, Jr., appointed counsel for Curtis D. Dale in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dale’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2