Filed: Aug. 11, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10383 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 11, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:08-cr-00226-ACC-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllll lllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JENNIFER YOUNG, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 11, 2010) Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10383 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 11, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 6:08-cr-00226-ACC-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllll lllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JENNIFER YOUNG, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 11, 2010) Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10383 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 11, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 6:08-cr-00226-ACC-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllll lllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JENNIFER YOUNG,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 11, 2010)
Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jenny L. Devine, appointed counsel for Jennifer Young in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Young’s
conviction and sentence under Count Three are AFFIRMED.
2