Filed: Sep. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-16284 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar SEPTEMBER 2, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 06-20581-CR-MGC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCOS JOSE OROZCO-WILCHES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 2, 2010) Before CARNES, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Manuel
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-16284 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar SEPTEMBER 2, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 06-20581-CR-MGC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCOS JOSE OROZCO-WILCHES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 2, 2010) Before CARNES, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Manuel ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-16284 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar SEPTEMBER 2, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 06-20581-CR-MGC
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARCOS JOSE OROZCO-WILCHES,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(September 2, 2010)
Before CARNES, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Manuel Vazquez, appointed counsel for Marcos Jose Orozco-Wilches in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Orozco-Wilches’s conviction
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2