Filed: Sep. 14, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11322 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00071-SPM-WCS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEVEN KRPATA Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 14, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwendol
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11322 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00071-SPM-WCS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus STEVEN KRPATA Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 14, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwendoly..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11322 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 14, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00071-SPM-WCS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
STEVEN KRPATA
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(September 14, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, Assistant Federal Public Defender and appellate counsel
for Steven Krpata in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Krpata’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2