Filed: Sep. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPT 22, 2010 No. 10-10738 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 3:97-cr-00314-HES-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLAUDE N. HAROLD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 22, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Maurice C. Grant
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPT 22, 2010 No. 10-10738 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 3:97-cr-00314-HES-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLAUDE N. HAROLD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 22, 2010) Before BARKETT, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Maurice C. Grant,..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
U.S.
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPT 22, 2010
No. 10-10738 JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:97-cr-00314-HES-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CLAUDE N. HAROLD,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 22, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Maurice C. Grant, II, appointed counsel for Claude N. Harold in this appeal
from the revocation of Harold’s supervised release and subsequent imposition of
an 11-month sentence, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Harold’s
supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED.
2