Filed: Sep. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPT 29, 2010 No. 10-11008 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cr-00024-LGW-JEG-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHON LEBRON-SANTANA, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (September 29, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, BAR
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS U.S. _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPT 29, 2010 No. 10-11008 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cr-00024-LGW-JEG-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHON LEBRON-SANTANA, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (September 29, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, BARK..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
U.S.
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPT 29, 2010
No. 10-11008 JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cr-00024-LGW-JEG-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JONATHON LEBRON-SANTANA,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(September 29, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Peter H. Schmidt, II, appointed counsel for Jonathon Lebron-Santana in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lebron-Santana’s conviction
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2