Filed: Oct. 04, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12240 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 4, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:04-cr-00265-SCB-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROSANNE ERON SIMPSON, a.k.a. Kevin Smith, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 4, 2010)
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12240 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 4, 2010 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:04-cr-00265-SCB-MAP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROSANNE ERON SIMPSON, a.k.a. Kevin Smith, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (October 4, 2010) ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-12240 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar OCTOBER 4, 2010
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 8:04-cr-00265-SCB-MAP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROSANNE ERON SIMPSON,
a.k.a. Kevin Smith,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 4, 2010)
Before BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Leonard E. Clark, appointed counsel for Rosanne Eron Simpson in this 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) proceeding, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of Simpson and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the
entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably
meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s denial of Simpson’s § 3582(c)(2) motion to reduce his sentence is
AFFIRMED.
2