Filed: Oct. 04, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-14766 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCTOBER 4, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 09-00138-CR-RDP-TMP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRYANT BERNARD EVANS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (October 4, 2010) Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James M.
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-14766 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT OCTOBER 4, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 09-00138-CR-RDP-TMP UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRYANT BERNARD EVANS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (October 4, 2010) Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James M. ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-14766 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
OCTOBER 4, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 09-00138-CR-RDP-TMP
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRYANT BERNARD EVANS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
_________________________
(October 4, 2010)
Before CARNES, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James M. Kendrick, appointed counsel for Bryant Bernard Evans in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Evans’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2