[DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________                  FILED
                                                           U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                           Nos. 09-15902 & 10-12263          ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                             NOVEMBER 18, 2010
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                                                                  JOHN LEY
                          ________________________                 CLERK

                      D.C. Docket No. 1:07-cv-20494-KMM

HON REALTY CORP.,
a Florida Corporation,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO.,
a California Corporation,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                  Appeals from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Florida
                         ________________________
                             (November 18, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, MARTIN, and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      This is a consolidated appeal arising out of the district court’s denial of a

request for an award of attorneys’ fees (R.2-75) and appellate attorneys’ fees (R.2-
86). Appellant First American Title Insurance Company (“First American”) argues

that the district court erred in denying requests for the award of attorneys’ fees

pursuant to section 768.79, Florida Statutes. We disagree.

      Plaintiff Hon Realty Corp. commenced this action by filing a Petition for

Declaratory Judgment in federal court. (R.1-1.) The parties’ basic dispute was

whether the title insurance that Hon Realty purchased from First American in 2005

covered the encumbrances or liens that were the subject of an Enforcement Order the

City of Miami issued in July 2005, but not recorded until fourteen days after Hon

Realty purchased the subject property in October 2005. Based on the language of an

explicit exclusion from coverage in the policy, the district court concluded that

coverage did not exist for any defect that was not recorded in the public records on

the effective date of the policy and, consequently, that First American afforded no

coverage for the Hon Realty’s claim. (R.2-52 at 4-7.)

      Upon entry of judgment in its favor, First American moved for an award of

attorneys’ fees based on a $500 Offer of Judgment made to Hon Realty in July 2007,

that Hon Realty did not accept. (R.2-53.) While the district court was deciding the

issue of attorneys’ fees, Hon Realty had appealed the entry of summary judgment to

this court. We affirmed, and remanded to the district court First American’s

application for appellate attorneys’ fees “for a determination of entitlement and the

                                         2
reasonable amount of appellate attorney’s fees, if any, to be awarded.” (R.2-71 at 1.)

For the same reasons stated in its order denying attorneys’ fees for work in the district

court, the district court denied First American’s motion for appellate attorneys’ fees.

       Upon careful consideration of the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree with

the district court’s well-reasoned analysis, concluding that First American was not

entitled to recover attorneys’ fees or appellate attorneys’ fees from Hon Realty

because this case “is the type of declaratory judgment action to which Florida’s fee-

shifting statute . . . do[es] not apply . . . .” (R.2-63 at 12.) Under Florida law, an offer

of judgment is unenforceable for taxing attorneys’ fees and costs if the case is not a

civil action for damages. Fla. Stat. § 768.79 (“In any civil action for damages . . . if

a defendant files an offer of judgment which is not accepted by the plaintiff . . . the

defendant shall be entitled to recover reasonable costs and attorney’s fees . . .”); Nat’l

Indem. Co. of the S. v. Consol. Ins. Svcs., 

, 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)

(holding that a declaratory judgment is not a civil action for damages). Because this

case is, at its heart, a declaratory action and not a civil action for damages as First

American argues, we affirm.

       AFFIRMED.




                                             3