Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Garnica, 10-10578 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-10578 Visitors: 64
Filed: Dec. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-10578 DEC 02, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00349-JSM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllll lllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PASCUAL GARNICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 2, 2010) Before BARKETT, MARCUS and AN
More
                                                                [DO NOT PUBLISH]

              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT           FILED
                      ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                             No. 10-10578                          DEC 02, 2010
                         Non-Argument Calendar                      JOHN LEY
                                                                      CLERK
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00349-JSM-TGW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

llllllllll                                        lllllllllll     Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                  versus



PASCUAL GARNICA,

                                           lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                           (December 2, 2010)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
      Daniel L. Castillo, appointed counsel for Pascual Garnica in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire

record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable

issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garnica’s

conviction and sentence under Count One are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer