Filed: Dec. 21, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-12005 DEC 21, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00107-CG-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSHUA EDWARD LEDKINS, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (December 21, 2010) Before HULL, WILSON and
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-12005 DEC 21, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00107-CG-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSHUA EDWARD LEDKINS, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (December 21, 2010) Before HULL, WILSON and M..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-12005 DEC 21, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00107-CG-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSHUA EDWARD LEDKINS,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(December 21, 2010)
Before HULL, WILSON and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Joshua Edward Ledkins in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Ledkins
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious
issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ledkins’s conviction
and sentence is AFFIRMED.
2