Filed: Jan. 31, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11643 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ JAN 31, 2011 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cv-02217-JEC GLENN A. DUNN, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DETECTIVE MANUAL NORRINGTON, Individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the City of Stone Mountain Police Department, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant, DETECTIVE LAWTON BENJAMIN, et al., llllllllllllllll
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11643 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ JAN 31, 2011 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cv-02217-JEC GLENN A. DUNN, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DETECTIVE MANUAL NORRINGTON, Individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the City of Stone Mountain Police Department, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant, DETECTIVE LAWTON BENJAMIN, et al., lllllllllllllllll..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11643 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ JAN 31, 2011 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cv-02217-JEC GLENN A. DUNN, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DETECTIVE MANUAL NORRINGTON, Individually and in his official capacity as an officer of the City of Stone Mountain Police Department, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant, DETECTIVE LAWTON BENJAMIN, et al., llllllllllllllllllllllDefendants. ________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (January 31, 2011) Before BLACK, HULL and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: After review of the parties’ briefs and the record, and with the benefit of oral argument, the Court finds no reversible error in the district court’s order, dated March 29, 2010, granting the Defendant-Appellant Norrington’s motion for summary judgment in part and denying that motion in part. We affirm that decision based on the thorough and well reasoned order of the district court. AFFIRMED. 2
