Filed: Feb. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12784 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 15, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-00487-JOF-JFK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUCAS OCHOA-PENALOSA, a.k.a. Ricardo Beltran-Gonzales, a.k.a. Jesus Gonzales-Gonzales, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Nor
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12784 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 15, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-00487-JOF-JFK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LUCAS OCHOA-PENALOSA, a.k.a. Ricardo Beltran-Gonzales, a.k.a. Jesus Gonzales-Gonzales, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Nort..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-12784 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 15, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-00487-JOF-JFK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LUCAS OCHOA-PENALOSA,
a.k.a. Ricardo Beltran-Gonzales,
a.k.a. Jesus Gonzales-Gonzales,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(February 15, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Lucas Ochoa-Penalosa appeals his sentence of 57 months of imprisonment
for reentering the United States illegally. 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Ochoa argues that
his sentence is unreasonable. We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by ordering that Ochoa’s
sentence run consecutive to the first seven years of a sentence imposed by a
Georgia court for trafficking in cocaine and concurrently afterward. When “a term
of imprisonment is imposed on a defendant who is already subject to an
undischarged term of imprisonment,” the district court decides whether the “terms
[should] run concurrently or consecutively.” 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a). Ochoa was
deported in December 2002 after completing a sentence of 60 months of
imprisonment for possessing at least 500 grams of cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1),
and, shortly after his term of supervised release expired, Ochoa left his family in
Mexico and reentered the United States illegally, where federal agents discovered
him in possession of 223 grams of cocaine base and a firearm. The district court
considered the sentencing factors and reasonably determined that a sentence at the
high end of the guideline range that ran partially concurrent with Ochoa’s sentence
in state court would best address his “persistent pattern of re-entry” to engage in
drug crimes. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(c) (2009); see
United States v. Irey,
612 F.3d 1160, 1190 (11th Cir. 2010). Ochoa’s sentence is
reasonable.
2
Ochoa’s sentence is AFFIRMED.
3