Filed: Mar. 23, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11405 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MARCH 23, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:08-cr-00102-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES JOHNSON, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (March 23, 2011) Before CARNES, PRYOR and ANDERSON,
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11405 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar MARCH 23, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 3:08-cr-00102-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES JOHNSON, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (March 23, 2011) Before CARNES, PRYOR and ANDERSON, ..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11405 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar MARCH 23, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 3:08-cr-00102-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES JOHNSON,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(March 23, 2011)
Before CARNES, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Augustus Harper, Jr., appointed counsel for James Johnson in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Johnson’s motion for the
appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED, and Johnson’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2