Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In Re: Checking Account Overdraft Litigation Doris Powell-Perry, Curnie Sanders vs Branch Banking and Trust Company, 10-12374 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-12374 Visitors: 38
Filed: Apr. 28, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APRIL 28, 2011 No. 10-12374 JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket Nos. 1:09-md-02036-JLK, 1:10-cv-20820-JLK In Re: CHECKING ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT LITIGATION _ DORIS POWELL-PERRY, Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, CURNIE SANDERS, Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court
More
                                                                 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT           FILED
                          ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                                  ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                                                     APRIL 28, 2011
                                 No. 10-12374
                                                                      JOHN LEY
                           ________________________
                                                                       CLERK

                      D.C. Docket Nos. 1:09-md-02036-JLK,
                              1:10-cv-20820-JLK

In Re: CHECKING ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT LITIGATION

___________________________________________________

DORIS POWELL-PERRY,
Individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated,
CURNIE SANDERS,

                                                              Plaintiffs-Appellees,

                                       versus

BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY,

                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                           ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Southern District of Florida
                         ________________________
                                 (April 28, 2011)
PRYOR and COX, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

      After oral argument in this case, the United States Supreme Court decided

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Conception, No. 09-893, 
2011 WL 1561956
(April 27, 2011).

The district court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration is VACATED, and

this case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme

Court’s opinion.

      VACATED AND REMANDED.1




      *
      Honorable W. Keith Watkins, United States District Judge for the Middle District of
Alabama, sitting by designation.
      1
          This is an unlimited remand.

                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer