Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Porfirio Ayala-Castaneda, 10-10260 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-10260 Visitors: 54
Filed: Jul. 01, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10260 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 1, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00064-ODE-ECS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PORFIRIO AYALA-CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (July 1, 2011) Before CARNES, BARKETT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Jay L
More
                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________           FILED
                                                   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                No. 10-10260         ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                            Non-Argument Calendar        JULY 1, 2011
                          ________________________        JOHN LEY
                                                           CLERK
                   D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00064-ODE-ECS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

      versus

PORFIRIO AYALA-CASTANEDA,
                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                          Northern District of Georgia
                         _________________________

                                   (July 1, 2011)

Before CARNES, BARKETT and MARCUS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      Jay L. Strongwater, appointed counsel for Porfirio Ayala-Castaneda in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ayala-Castaneda’s conviction

and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer