Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jimmy Joseph, 10-15323 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-15323 Visitors: 37
Filed: Jul. 25, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15323 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JULY 25, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 0:10-cr-60059-JAL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JIMMY JOSEPH, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 25, 2011) Before WILSON, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas John Butler,
More
                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________            FILED
                                                   U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                No. 10-15323         ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                            Non-Argument Calendar        JULY 25, 2011
                          ________________________        JOHN LEY
                                                            CLERK
                     D.C. Docket No. 0:10-cr-60059-JAL-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

JIMMY JOSEPH,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                         ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Florida
                        ________________________

                                 (July 25, 2011)

Before WILSON, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel for Jimmy Joseph in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Joseph and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because independent examination of the entire record

reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,

and Joseph’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer