Filed: Aug. 02, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-10732 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 2, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 5:10-cr-00046-RS-LB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RANDY MACKEITH DUNCANSON, a.k.a. Lorenzo McCloud, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Norther
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-10732 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT AUGUST 2, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 5:10-cr-00046-RS-LB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RANDY MACKEITH DUNCANSON, a.k.a. Lorenzo McCloud, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 11-10732 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
AUGUST 2, 2011
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 5:10-cr-00046-RS-LB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RANDY MACKEITH DUNCANSON,
a.k.a. Lorenzo McCloud,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(August 2, 2011)
Before BARKETT, MARCUS and FAY, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Dingus, appointed counsel for Randy MacKeith Duncanson in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Duncanson’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2