Filed: Aug. 04, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14505 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 4, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00166-JDW-EAJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISAC VELASQUEZ-PEREZ, a.k.a. Jaime Sifuentes-Villega, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Mi
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-14505 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 4, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00166-JDW-EAJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ISAC VELASQUEZ-PEREZ, a.k.a. Jaime Sifuentes-Villega, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Mid..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-14505 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 4, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00166-JDW-EAJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ISAC VELASQUEZ-PEREZ,
a.k.a. Jaime Sifuentes-Villega,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 4, 2011)
Before HULL, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Maria Guzman, appointed counsel for Isac Velasquez-Perez, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Velasquez-
Perez’s conviction and within-guideline sentence is AFFIRMED.
2