Filed: Aug. 09, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-12281 AUGUST 9, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00013-CDL-GMF-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RANDOLPH LAWRENCE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (August 9, 2011) Before CARNES, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: William
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-12281 AUGUST 9, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00013-CDL-GMF-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RANDOLPH LAWRENCE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (August 9, 2011) Before CARNES, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: William J..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-12281 AUGUST 9, 2011
Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY
CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00013-CDL-GMF-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RANDOLPH LAWRENCE,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
_________________________
(August 9, 2011)
Before CARNES, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
William J. Mason, appointed counsel for Randolph Lawrence in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lawrence’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2