Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Randolph Lawrence, 10-12281 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 10-12281 Visitors: 78
Filed: Aug. 09, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-12281 AUGUST 9, 2011 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00013-CDL-GMF-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RANDOLPH LAWRENCE, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (August 9, 2011) Before CARNES, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: William
More
                                                               [DO NOT PUBLISH]

                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT           FILED
                          ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                              ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                 No. 10-12281                   AUGUST 9, 2011
                             Non-Argument Calendar                JOHN LEY
                                                                   CLERK
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 4:09-cr-00013-CDL-GMF-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

RANDOLPH LAWRENCE,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                          __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Georgia
                        _________________________

                                  (August 9, 2011)

Before CARNES, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      William J. Mason, appointed counsel for Randolph Lawrence in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lawrence’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer