Filed: Aug. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11820 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 15, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00534-RAL-AEP-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHIRLEY DANIELS, a.k.a. Miss Shelly llllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 15, 2011) Before EDMO
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11820 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 15, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00534-RAL-AEP-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHIRLEY DANIELS, a.k.a. Miss Shelly llllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 15, 2011) Before EDMON..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11820 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 15, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00534-RAL-AEP-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHIRLEY DANIELS,
a.k.a. Miss Shelly
llllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 15, 2011)
Before EDMONDSON, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
R. Scott Andringa, appointed counsel for Shirley Daniels, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Daniels’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2