Filed: Aug. 17, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15576 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 17, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:05-cr-00196-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC LAMONT JOHNSON, a.k.a. William Ayala, a.k.a. Hafeez Malik Hakeem, a.k.a. Johnny Tomas, a.k.a. Chico Moniker, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States Distric
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-15576 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 17, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:05-cr-00196-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERIC LAMONT JOHNSON, a.k.a. William Ayala, a.k.a. Hafeez Malik Hakeem, a.k.a. Johnny Tomas, a.k.a. Chico Moniker, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-15576 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar AUGUST 17, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 1:05-cr-00196-WS-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERIC LAMONT JOHNSON,
a.k.a. William Ayala,
a.k.a. Hafeez Malik Hakeem,
a.k.a. Johnny Tomas,
a.k.a. Chico Moniker,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(August 17, 2011)
Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Ratliff, appointed counsel for Eric Johnson in this direct criminal
appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2