Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Branden Scott Bowser, 12-15521 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-15521 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 31, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-15521 Date Filed: 10/31/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15521 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00220-IPJ-RRA-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRANDEN SCOTT BOWSER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (October 31, 2013) Before WILSON, FAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Brian D. Clark, appointed c
More
              Case: 12-15521    Date Filed: 10/31/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 12-15521
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00220-IPJ-RRA-2



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

BRANDEN SCOTT BOWSER,

                                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Alabama
                          ________________________

                                (October 31, 2013)

Before WILSON, FAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Brian D. Clark, appointed counsel for Branden Scott Bowser in this appeal,

has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a
              Case: 12-15521    Date Filed: 10/31/2013   Page: 2 of 2


brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bowser’s conviction and sentence in the

instant case are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer