Filed: Oct. 31, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-15521 Date Filed: 10/31/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15521 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00220-IPJ-RRA-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRANDEN SCOTT BOWSER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (October 31, 2013) Before WILSON, FAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Brian D. Clark, appointed c
Summary: Case: 12-15521 Date Filed: 10/31/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15521 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00220-IPJ-RRA-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRANDEN SCOTT BOWSER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (October 31, 2013) Before WILSON, FAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Brian D. Clark, appointed co..
More
Case: 12-15521 Date Filed: 10/31/2013 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-15521
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00220-IPJ-RRA-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRANDEN SCOTT BOWSER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(October 31, 2013)
Before WILSON, FAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Brian D. Clark, appointed counsel for Branden Scott Bowser in this appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a
Case: 12-15521 Date Filed: 10/31/2013 Page: 2 of 2
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merits of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bowser’s conviction and sentence in the
instant case are AFFIRMED.
2