Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Eddie Littles, III, 12-15673 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-15673 Visitors: 65
Filed: Nov. 21, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-15673 Date Filed: 11/21/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15673 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00001-BAE-GRS-6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDDIE LITTLES, III, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (November 21, 2013) Before MARCUS, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Christopher E. Chapman, appoi
More
              Case: 12-15673     Date Filed: 11/21/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]


               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 12-15673
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00001-BAE-GRS-6

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

EDDIE LITTLES, III,

                                                               Defendant-Appellant.

                          __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Georgia
                        _________________________

                               (November 21, 2013)

Before MARCUS, FAY and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Christopher E. Chapman, appointed counsel for Eddie Littles, III, in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 87 S.Ct.
              Case: 12-15673     Date Filed: 11/21/2013   Page: 2 of 2


1396, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Littles’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer