Vesta Noles v. City of Guntersville, Alabama, 13-12277 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Number: 13-12277
Visitors: 112
Filed: Dec. 31, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-12277 Date Filed: 12/31/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12277 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cv-03840-RBP VESTA NOLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF GUNTERSVILLE, ALABAMA, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (December 31, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Having reviewed the record and consi
Summary: Case: 13-12277 Date Filed: 12/31/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12277 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cv-03840-RBP VESTA NOLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF GUNTERSVILLE, ALABAMA, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (December 31, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Having reviewed the record and consid..
More
Case: 13-12277 Date Filed: 12/31/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 13-12277 Non-Argument Calendar _____________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cv-03840-RBP VESTA NOLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF GUNTERSVILLE, ALABAMA, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________ (December 31, 2013) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Having reviewed the record and considered the arguments of the parties contained in their briefs, we affirm the district court in all respects related to this appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Case: 13-12277 Date Filed: 12/31/2013 Page: 2 of 2 AFFIRMED. 2
Source: CourtListener
