Filed: Jan. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13210 Date Filed: 01/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13210 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00327-CEH-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL DENARD JONES, a.k.a. Bleek Jones, a.k.a. Michael D. Jones, a.k.a. Bleek, a.k.a. B, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 21, 2014) Case: 13-13210 Date
Summary: Case: 13-13210 Date Filed: 01/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13210 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00327-CEH-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL DENARD JONES, a.k.a. Bleek Jones, a.k.a. Michael D. Jones, a.k.a. Bleek, a.k.a. B, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 21, 2014) Case: 13-13210 Date F..
More
Case: 13-13210 Date Filed: 01/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13210
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00327-CEH-KRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL DENARD JONES,
a.k.a. Bleek Jones,
a.k.a. Michael D. Jones,
a.k.a. Bleek,
a.k.a. B,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 21, 2014)
Case: 13-13210 Date Filed: 01/21/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Michael Denard Jones in his
sentence-reduction proceedings pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the
denial of Jones’s § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.
2