Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Michael Denard Jones, 13-13210 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-13210 Visitors: 45
Filed: Jan. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13210 Date Filed: 01/21/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13210 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00327-CEH-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL DENARD JONES, a.k.a. Bleek Jones, a.k.a. Michael D. Jones, a.k.a. Bleek, a.k.a. B, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 21, 2014) Case: 13-13210 Date
More
           Case: 13-13210   Date Filed: 01/21/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 13-13210
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00327-CEH-KRS-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

MICHAEL DENARD JONES,
a.k.a. Bleek Jones,
a.k.a. Michael D. Jones,
a.k.a. Bleek,
a.k.a. B,
                                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (January 21, 2014)
              Case: 13-13210     Date Filed: 01/21/2014   Page: 2 of 2


Before TJOFLAT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Michael Denard Jones in his

sentence-reduction proceedings pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has filed a

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the

denial of Jones’s § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer