Filed: Feb. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-12554 Date Filed: 02/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12554 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00149-RAL-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO CALIXTO-MORAN, a.k.a. Chino, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 11, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-12554 Da
Summary: Case: 13-12554 Date Filed: 02/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12554 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00149-RAL-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PEDRO CALIXTO-MORAN, a.k.a. Chino, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (February 11, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-12554 Dat..
More
Case: 13-12554 Date Filed: 02/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12554
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00149-RAL-TGW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PEDRO CALIXTO-MORAN,
a.k.a. Chino,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(February 11, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-12554 Date Filed: 02/11/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Stephen V. Iglesias, appointed counsel for Pedro Calixto-Moran, has moved
to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED,
and Calixto-Moran’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2