Filed: Feb. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13000 Date Filed: 02/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13000 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00006-RV-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORINE D. MOTLEY, a.k.a. Corine Gillreath, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (February 25, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-1
Summary: Case: 13-13000 Date Filed: 02/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13000 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00006-RV-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CORINE D. MOTLEY, a.k.a. Corine Gillreath, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (February 25, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13..
More
Case: 13-13000 Date Filed: 02/25/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13000
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00006-RV-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CORINE D. MOTLEY,
a.k.a. Corine Gillreath,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(February 25, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-13000 Date Filed: 02/25/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Corine D. Motley in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Motley’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2