Filed: Mar. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-12890 Date Filed: 03/13/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12890 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00289-TWT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORIN JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (March 13, 2014) Before WILSON, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. Case: 13-12890 Date Filed: 03/13/2014 Page: 2
Summary: Case: 13-12890 Date Filed: 03/13/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12890 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00289-TWT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ORIN JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (March 13, 2014) Before WILSON, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. Case: 13-12890 Date Filed: 03/13/2014 Page: 2 ..
More
Case: 13-12890 Date Filed: 03/13/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12890
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-00289-TWT-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ORIN JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(March 13, 2014)
Before WILSON, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Case: 13-12890 Date Filed: 03/13/2014 Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Orin Jackson appeals his 12-month sentence, imposed at the high end of the
applicable guideline range, which he received upon revocation of supervised
release. During the revocation hearing, Jackson’s counsel asked the court “to
impose a guideline sentence of between six and twelve months.” Jackson’s
sentencing claim is precluded: the alleged error was invited. See United States v.
Love,
449 F.3d 1154, 1157 (11th Cir. 2006) . Moreover, we affirm because his
sentence is supported by the record -- including marked recidivism -- and meets the
goals encompassed within 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). In sum, the sentence has not been
shown to be unreasonable. See United States v. Turner,
626 F.3d 566, 573 (11th
Cir. 2010).
AFFIRMED.
2