Filed: Mar. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13220 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00207-BAE-GRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TISHARD ROMELL BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (March 27, 2014) Before PRYOR, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert Nye, appointed counsel fo
Summary: Case: 13-13220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13220 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00207-BAE-GRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TISHARD ROMELL BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (March 27, 2014) Before PRYOR, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert Nye, appointed counsel for..
More
Case: 13-13220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13220
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00207-BAE-GRS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TISHARD ROMELL BROWN,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
_________________________
(March 27, 2014)
Before PRYOR, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Nye, appointed counsel for Tishard Brown in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Brown, arguing that
there are no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could appeal either his
conviction or his sentence. Nye filed a brief identifying arguable issues for appeal
Case: 13-13220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 2 of 2
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Brown did
not respond to Nye’s motion to withdraw or the Anders brief.
After a careful, independent review of the record, we conclude that there are
no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could base an appeal. For this reason,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown=s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2