Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Tishard Romell Brown, 13-13220 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-13220 Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13220 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00207-BAE-GRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TISHARD ROMELL BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (March 27, 2014) Before PRYOR, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert Nye, appointed counsel fo
More
              Case: 13-13220    Date Filed: 03/27/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                 No. 13-13220
                             Non-Argument Calendar
                           ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00207-BAE-GRS-2

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

TISHARD ROMELL BROWN,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Georgia
                        _________________________

                                 (March 27, 2014)

Before PRYOR, MARTIN, and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Robert Nye, appointed counsel for Tishard Brown in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Brown, arguing that

there are no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could appeal either his

conviction or his sentence. Nye filed a brief identifying arguable issues for appeal
             Case: 13-13220     Date Filed: 03/27/2014   Page: 2 of 2


pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
(1967). Brown did

not respond to Nye’s motion to withdraw or the Anders brief.

      After a careful, independent review of the record, we conclude that there are

no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could base an appeal. For this reason,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown=s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer