Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Derrick Walker, 13-14220 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-14220 Visitors: 57
Filed: Mar. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14220 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14220 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00236-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK WALKER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 27, 2014) Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-14220 Date Filed
More
            Case: 13-14220   Date Filed: 03/27/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 13-14220
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 1:09-cr-00236-WS-B-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

DERRICK WALKER,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Alabama
                       ________________________

                             (March 27, 2014)

Before CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-14220     Date Filed: 03/27/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Elsie Mae Miller, appointed counsel for Derrick Walker in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walker’s revocation of

supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer