Filed: Mar. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-12771 Date Filed: 03/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12771 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00181-TWT-LTW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLIE SHIVERS, III, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (March 31, 2014) Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: R. Gary Spencer, appointed co
Summary: Case: 13-12771 Date Filed: 03/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12771 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00181-TWT-LTW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLIE SHIVERS, III, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (March 31, 2014) Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: R. Gary Spencer, appointed cou..
More
Case: 13-12771 Date Filed: 03/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12771
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00181-TWT-LTW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLIE SHIVERS, III,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(March 31, 2014)
Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
R. Gary Spencer, appointed counsel for Charlie Shivers, III, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 13-12771 Date Filed: 03/31/2014 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Shivers’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2