Filed: Apr. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-11891 Date Filed: 04/02/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11891 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00170-JA-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUEL BROWN, a.k.a. King David, a.k.a. KD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 2, 2014) Before PRYOR, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-1189
Summary: Case: 13-11891 Date Filed: 04/02/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11891 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00170-JA-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RUEL BROWN, a.k.a. King David, a.k.a. KD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 2, 2014) Before PRYOR, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-11891..
More
Case: 13-11891 Date Filed: 04/02/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-11891
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00170-JA-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RUEL BROWN,
a.k.a. King David,
a.k.a. KD,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 2, 2014)
Before PRYOR, MARTIN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-11891 Date Filed: 04/02/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Angela Wright, appointed counsel for Ruel Brown in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2