Filed: Apr. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-12715 Date Filed: 04/09/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12715 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00004-DHB-WLB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRYON J. NORRIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (April 9, 2014) Before HULL, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Peterson IV, appointed couns
Summary: Case: 13-12715 Date Filed: 04/09/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12715 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00004-DHB-WLB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRYON J. NORRIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (April 9, 2014) Before HULL, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas A. Peterson IV, appointed counse..
More
Case: 13-12715 Date Filed: 04/09/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12715
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00004-DHB-WLB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TERRYON J. NORRIS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(April 9, 2014)
Before HULL, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas A. Peterson IV, appointed counsel for Terryon J. Norris in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 13-12715 Date Filed: 04/09/2014 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Norris=s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2