Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ober Merino Cruz, 13-11254 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-11254 Visitors: 97
Filed: Apr. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-11254 Date Filed: 04/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-11254 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-20412-JAL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OBER MERINO CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (April 16, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-11254 Date Filed: 04/16/20
More
           Case: 13-11254   Date Filed: 04/16/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                      [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 13-11254
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-20412-JAL-2



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

OBER MERINO CRUZ,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Southern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                              (April 16, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-11254     Date Filed: 04/16/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Thomas John Butler, appointed counsel for Ober Merino Cruz in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cruz’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer