Filed: Apr. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-12103 Date Filed: 04/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12103 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00059-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDWIN MOORE ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (April 22, 2014) Before WILSON, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Clyde M. Taylor, Jr., appoint
Summary: Case: 13-12103 Date Filed: 04/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12103 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00059-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDWIN MOORE ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (April 22, 2014) Before WILSON, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Clyde M. Taylor, Jr., appointe..
More
Case: 13-12103 Date Filed: 04/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12103
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:12-cr-00059-RH-CAS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDWIN MOORE ANDERSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(April 22, 2014)
Before WILSON, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Clyde M. Taylor, Jr., appointed counsel for Edwin Moore Anderson in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 13-12103 Date Filed: 04/22/2014 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Anderson’s convictions and
total sentence are AFFIRMED.
2