Filed: Apr. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-12196 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12196 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00166-CG-C-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FLORENCE CHIGOZIE NNA, RODNEY EUGENE HILL, Defendants-Appellants. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (April 29, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Paul D.
Summary: Case: 13-12196 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12196 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00166-CG-C-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FLORENCE CHIGOZIE NNA, RODNEY EUGENE HILL, Defendants-Appellants. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (April 29, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Paul D. B..
More
Case: 13-12196 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12196
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00166-CG-C-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FLORENCE CHIGOZIE NNA,
RODNEY EUGENE HILL,
Defendants-Appellants.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(April 29, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Paul D. Brown, appointed counsel for Rodney Eugene Hill in this direct
Case: 13-12196 Date Filed: 04/29/2014 Page: 2 of 2
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). J. Clark Stankowski, appointed counsel for Florence
Chigozie Nna in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’
motions to withdraw are GRANTED, and Hills’s and Nna’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2