Filed: May 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13991 Date Filed: 05/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13991 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00027-MW-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILIP WAYNE MATHENIA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (May 5, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwendolyn Louise Spivey, appointed
Summary: Case: 13-13991 Date Filed: 05/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13991 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00027-MW-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PHILIP WAYNE MATHENIA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (May 5, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Gwendolyn Louise Spivey, appointed c..
More
Case: 13-13991 Date Filed: 05/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13991
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00027-MW-CAS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PHILIP WAYNE MATHENIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(May 5, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Louise Spivey, appointed counsel for Philip Wayne Mathenia in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87
Case: 13-13991 Date Filed: 05/05/2014 Page: 2 of
2
S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mathenia’s conviction
and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2