Filed: May 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-12463 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12463 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00001-BAE-GRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEVIN LAMONT GOURDINE, a.k.a. Blue, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (May 7, 2014) Before PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-12463 Da
Summary: Case: 12-12463 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12463 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00001-BAE-GRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEVIN LAMONT GOURDINE, a.k.a. Blue, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (May 7, 2014) Before PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-12463 Dat..
More
Case: 12-12463 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-12463
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00001-BAE-GRS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
KEVIN LAMONT GOURDINE,
a.k.a. Blue,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(May 7, 2014)
Before PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-12463 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2
E. Vaughn Dunnigan, appointed counsel for Kevin Lamont Gourdine in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gourdine’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2