Filed: May 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-12991 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12991 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00021-EAK-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLTON WINSTON ABRAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 7, 2014) Case: 13-12991 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit
Summary: Case: 13-12991 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-12991 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00021-EAK-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLTON WINSTON ABRAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (May 7, 2014) Case: 13-12991 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit J..
More
Case: 13-12991 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-12991
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00021-EAK-TBM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLTON WINSTON ABRAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 7, 2014)
Case: 13-12991 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Before HULL, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher DeLaughter, appointed counsel for Charlton Abrams in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Abrams’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2