Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Errardo Santillana, 13-13708 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-13708 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jun. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13708 Date Filed: 06/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13708 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00564-RAL-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff -Appellee, versus ERRARDO SANTILLANA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13708 Date Filed: 06/05
More
           Case: 13-13708   Date Filed: 06/05/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]


            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 13-13708
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00564-RAL-TGW-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                              Plaintiff -Appellee,

                                  versus

ERRARDO SANTILLANA,


                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                              (June 5, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and JORDAN, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-13708     Date Filed: 06/05/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Cynthia J. Hernandez, appointed counsel for Errardo Santillana, has filed a

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer