Filed: Jun. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14165 Date Filed: 06/10/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14165 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00055-SDM-EAJ-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOAQUIN RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 10, 2014) Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for
Summary: Case: 13-14165 Date Filed: 06/10/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14165 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00055-SDM-EAJ-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOAQUIN RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 10, 2014) Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for ..
More
Case: 13-14165 Date Filed: 06/10/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14165
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00055-SDM-EAJ-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOAQUIN RAMIREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 10, 2014)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Joaquin Ramirez in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 13-14165 Date Filed: 06/10/2014 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ramirez’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2