Judges: Cope and Suarez, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge
Filed: Nov. 12, 2008
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: 994 So. 2d 1190 (2008) Samson LOUIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D08-506. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 12, 2008. Clayton R. Kaeiser, Miami, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Nicholas Merlin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The defendant claim
Summary: 994 So. 2d 1190 (2008) Samson LOUIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D08-506. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. November 12, 2008. Clayton R. Kaeiser, Miami, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Nicholas Merlin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The defendant claims..
More
994 So. 2d 1190 (2008)
Samson LOUIS, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 3D08-506.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 12, 2008.
Clayton R. Kaeiser, Miami, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Nicholas Merlin, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE and SUAREZ, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The defendant claims on appeal that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request to place him in drug court for which the defendant was apparently qualified. The State has acknowledged that the defendant was qualified for drug court. Because the record before this Court fails to conclusively refute the defendant's claim that his trial counsel failed to request he be placed in drug court, we reverse the order and remand for an evidentiary hearing or other appropriate relief. Should the trial court again enter an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts exclusively showing the defendant was not entitled to the relief requested.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
