Filed: Jun. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14788 Date Filed: 06/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14788 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00488-KOB-JEO-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM ROBERT HOSEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (June 30, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: W. Scott Brower, appointed co
Summary: Case: 13-14788 Date Filed: 06/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14788 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00488-KOB-JEO-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM ROBERT HOSEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (June 30, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: W. Scott Brower, appointed cou..
More
Case: 13-14788 Date Filed: 06/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14788
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00488-KOB-JEO-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM ROBERT HOSEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(June 30, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
W. Scott Brower, appointed counsel for William Robert Hosey in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
Case: 13-14788 Date Filed: 06/30/2014 Page: 2 of 2
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hosey’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2