Filed: Jul. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15098 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00009-RS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL D. NEELY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 10, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/
Summary: Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15098 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00009-RS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL D. NEELY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 10, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/2..
More
Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15098
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00009-RS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL D. NEELY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(July 10, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-15098 Date Filed: 07/10/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Michael D. Neely in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Neely’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2