Filed: Aug. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-14892 Date Filed: 08/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14892 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00275-JRH-BKE-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TIQUELA N. MURRAY, a.k.a. Kisha Jones, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (August 11, 2014) Before WILSON, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case
Summary: Case: 13-14892 Date Filed: 08/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-14892 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00275-JRH-BKE-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TIQUELA N. MURRAY, a.k.a. Kisha Jones, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (August 11, 2014) Before WILSON, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case:..
More
Case: 13-14892 Date Filed: 08/11/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-14892
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00275-JRH-BKE-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TIQUELA N. MURRAY,
a.k.a. Kisha Jones,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(August 11, 2014)
Before WILSON, ANDERSON and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-14892 Date Filed: 08/11/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Andrew A. Murdison, appointed counsel for Tiquela N. Murray, has moved
to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED,
and Murray’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2