Filed: Aug. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13577 Date Filed: 08/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13577 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00039-HL-TQL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OTTO G. PENA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (August 19, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13577 Date Filed: 08/19/2014
Summary: Case: 13-13577 Date Filed: 08/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13577 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00039-HL-TQL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus OTTO G. PENA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (August 19, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13577 Date Filed: 08/19/2014 ..
More
Case: 13-13577 Date Filed: 08/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13577
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00039-HL-TQL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
OTTO G. PENA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(August 19, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-13577 Date Filed: 08/19/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Martin J. Vogelbaum, appointed counsel for Otto Pena in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pena’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2